If you’re comparing providers, this is the cleanest way to decide.
Not a brochure. Not a hype deck. A decision flow that exposes operational truth — and converts it into board-level confidence.
Compliance and failure exposure
Identify where risk events are actually created (process, asset, supplier, governance) and what it would take to reduce them.
Cost leakage and controllable waste
Separate unavoidable cost from leakage — then model the recovery you can credibly defend in the boardroom.
Board-ready evidence, not opinions
UKBPM Outcomes AI™ turns signals into traceable decisions — so ROI claims can be audited, not argued.
Stress-test outcomes in 90 seconds.
Use this to create a directional baseline. In a strategy session we calibrate to your estate, contracts and data.
Why most comparisons fail: they compare features, not outcomes.
Use this as a decision lens. Then go deeper in the full comparison tool.
| Decision criteria | Traditional FM provider | Dashboards / BI | UKBPM model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proof of ROI Can you defend value in the boardroom? |
Often anecdotal or lagging KPIs. | Shows trends, rarely attribution. | Causal attribution + outcome trail via UKBPM Outcomes AI™. |
| Compliance & audit confidence | Depends on process discipline. | Evidence is fragmented across systems. | Governance-first, evidence-ready, exceptions surfaced early. |
| Reactive reduction | Improves slowly; still fire-fighting. | Reports the problem; doesn’t change it. | Signal-to-action loop that shifts operating mode quickly. |
| Cost leakage visibility | Hidden inside rates and variations. | Data exists but not stitched to decisions. | Leakage mapped to controllable drivers + actions. |
| Time-to-confidence | Months of debate. | Weeks to build, months to trust. | 90-day proof path with decision pack outputs. |
Watch the decision chain (signal → action → outcome).
This is the gap competitors can’t close: proving what changed — and why.
Signals: noisy, fragmented, expensive
UKBPM ingests CAFM/CMMS, BMS, IoT and workflow data to create a clean operational truth layer — without waiting for perfect data.
A buyer-safe path that doesn’t disrupt operations.
You get proof early, without forcing a platform rewrite.
Weeks 1–2: baseline + leakage map
Rapid signal capture, risk hotspots, contract leakage scan, and initial opportunity sizing.
Weeks 3–6: intervention pilots
Targeted fixes that reduce reactive load and tighten evidence, tied to specific drivers.
Weeks 7–12: proof + board pack
Outcome trail, governance controls, and a board-ready decision pack to scale or exit.
Common buyer questions
Is this a sales pitch?
No. It’s a pressure test. If the numbers don’t hold, we’ll say so.
Do we need to replace our CAFM/CMMS or ServiceNow?
Not to start. The decision path is designed to prove value without a disruptive rip-and-replace.
How do you avoid giving away the full framework for free?
This page is a teaser. The simulator is intentionally directional; full calibration and delivery are part of paid engagement.
Ready to pressure-test your decision?
Book a session to validate your ROI case, expose leakage and risk, and decide confidently — with proof you can defend.
Or explore our frameworks and tools: